CALIFORNIA
ESTABLISHES STATEWIDE
DIALYSIS
FACILITIES MEMBERSHIP ORGANIZATION
On
May 21, 1982, the California Dialysis Council was established. For the first
time in the State of California, and perhaps any State, dialysis facilities,
represented by their Medical Director and Administrator, met together to adopt
an organizational structure which will serve as a vehicle for coordination and
communication to meet needs and interest of its members statewide.
California
Dialysis Council has filed for incorporation as a Nonprofit, Mutual Benefit
Corporation. Its formation was a straightforward approach to bring dialysis
facilities together; hospital-based, freestanding, nonprofit, for profit.
Northern California, Southern California, physicians, and administrators. The
organization was not designed or intended to duplicate other professional
organizations and it supersedes purposely individual interests and individual
personalities. California Dialysis Council was not the product of one or two
individuals, but the result of many physicians and administrators working
together to meet a common needs.
BACKGROUND
During
the month of November 1981, a group of concerned administrators and medical
directors from dialysis facilities throughout the State of California met for
the purpose of discussing alternative courses of action necessary to deal with
continuing and escalating legislation affecting the health field, and in
particular, dialysis. This initial meeting was organized by a small handful of
dialysis facilities who, having financially supported legislative advocacy on
proposed legislation, foresaw the need to broaden the base of financial support
and active involvement. The legislation, Assembly Bill 931 (Reuse) and Assembly
Bill 932 (Licensing of Hemodialysis Technicians) was of interest to a larger
percentage of dialysis facilities than just a small handful. It followed that a
larger percentage of facilities, if given the opportunity in an organized and
structured way, would participate in a statewide effort to collectively
communicate with the legislature and support the cost in doing so.
Out
of the discussions of this meeting emerged a consensus that the dialysis
community in California must be better organized to deal effectively with the
legislative process and State bureaucracy which is being created in this field.
Therefore, a Steering Committee was formed for the purpose of structuring a
statewide organization. Steering Committee members represented a broad cross
section of the dialysis provider community. Represented on the committee were
Northern and Southern California, hospital-based and freestanding, for profit
and not-for-profit, and physicians and administrators.
NEED
FOR STATEWIDE ORGANIZATION
The
Steering Committee, at its first meeting in early December 1981, reexamined why
there was an interest, and more importantly, a need to bring dialysis facilities
together through a statewide voluntary membership organization.
Organizational
and Administrative Crack
In
the State of California, renal failure and our dialysis facility community falls
between the cracks organizationally and administratively. There is no central
organization to act as spokesman, coordinate unified action, respond to needs
and interest, and to act as watchdog over the administrative interest of the
dialysis community. Facilities, collectively as a group, are not directly
represented through the membership structure of Hospital Councils, California
Hospital Association, County Medical Associations, and California Medical
Association.
There
is no central organization in the State of California even though there has been
a proliferation of dialysis related organizations in our field across the
country: NCC, NKF, AANA, CNNT, RPA, AWD, ASN, NAPHT, NRAA, ASAIO. Each of these
organizations has its own specific purpose, however, the combined purpose of all
of these organizations does not meet the purpose of the California Dialysis
Council.
The
Network Coordinating Council organizational structure did not provide the
structure to obtain the purposes of CDC for the following reasons:
1.)
Two (2) networks cover California. Network Coordinating Council #3 covers
Northern California and Nevada (excluding dark county). Network Coordinating
Council #4 covers Southern California and Southern Nevada (Cark County). Network
Coordinating Councils would, therefore, not provide a centralized statewide
organization.
2.)
Network Coordinating Councils were created by federal legislation and are
federally funded. Network Coordinating Councils are, therefore, not voluntary
organizations.
3.)
By definition, Network Coordinating Councils serve as a resource to community
health planners and as a liaison to the federal government ( Title 20, Chapter
III. Part 405.2102 (0) ).
Reason
Why to Organize;
The
Steering Committee discussed the following five reasons why dialysis facilities
should become organized:
1. United
effort - (Single voice) - A way of creating a spokesman for our dialysis
community.
2. Man
Power Resource - A way to bring all of us together to lend our individual
talent and interest in an organized way.
3. Tap
existing resources - A way to take advantage of the resources of our own
people and other health organizations.
4. Provide necessary money as a vital
resource - A way to provide the means to purchase services to meet our
objective and to support our activities.
5. Centralized
Coordination - A way to effectively coordinate throughout the State of
California to meet and respond to our needs and interests.
Interests
Whereas
the following areas of interest of dialysis facilities were identified, the
primary motivation and interest to form the California Dialysis Council at this
time was to deal with the continuing and escalating legislation affecting the
dialysis field: